Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
On Mon 09 Oct 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> Thanks. My point to him was that, other than the changelogs, there is
> nothing to denote that the upload is for potato as well. Guess it doesn't
Argh, now I understand. It was uploaded to woody (as well, but you
didn't realize that, you only saw it appear in woody) and you
built it (on woody of course :) and uploaded as usual. And the
changelog happened to say "stable unstable" so it also got installed
into potato. I didn't realize what exactly had happened at first.
In this case I *do* find it very curious that the other (auto)builders
had no trouble about linking to the wrong version of libs; that would
mean that either they explictly only upload to unstable (overriding
what's in changelog) or that those machines are out of date. I assume
the first (that's what the alpha autobuilder does as well, or at least
did, which is why potato got left behind when it got frozen, and
packages were being uploaded to "frozen stable").
Paul
Reply to: