Re: Bad dependencies list
On 31 Jul 2000, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> We've sent the maintainer a patch some weeks ago, and it seemed he
> might actually use them. Let's see...
Fingers are crossed :-)
> Could you elaborate on this? X on Alpha certainly has ZPixmaps, and I
> get the same extensions listed as on an i386. What exactly is missing?
PEX5 support. The extension's #defines are all in the headers, but the
extension shared lib never compiles (it's purposely omitted from alpha
since it's not 64-bit clean...even in 4.0.x). Technically, we have
ZPixmaps, but the SHM support is limited.
C
Reply to: