Re: fast math lib?
> > what do you recommend: Using the lffm of Joachim Wesener or the
> > Compaq compilers to increase calculation speed of
> > "home-compiled" programs (21164a, potato)?
> Both do well, but I'd personally prefer the Compaq CPML library. It's
> faster in most cases, and provides for more functions (and
> exceptions) than libffm. I maintain the libffm debs, so those are
> available for use, in case you wanted to keep it "free" though.
> C
I think the Compaq libraries are more robust and give higer accuracy.
rgh
Reply to: