Re: openldap on alpha
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 04:09:41PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000 dan@mid-hudson.com wrote:
>
> > In my unprofessional opinion, I would say that it should be increased.
> > Under any load openldap might as well not work with this as a problem.
> > There was a stable release on 5/15 and this bug has been around for longer
> > then that, so it seems as if it has be disregarded. I'm not sure how this
> > works when the problem seems to be upstream though.
>
> It has been upgraded and I believe David is sending a note to the
> maintainer with an offer to NMU it (my recommendation). I'm recompiling
> it now and will forward a URL to fetch the new packages when I'm done.
>
> > I'm not sure what release of 1.2.10 the patch was created from, but it
> > doesn't seem to apply to the latest stable or release, so I have not been
> > able to test it. This leaves me in kind of an awkward position. =P
> > Suggestions?
>
> I just tested it and David is correct (as is the patch). You'll have new
> debs in the next 30 mins :-)
Do not NMU. I have a new openldap package with Dave's patch already that
also includes some other things.
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: