[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: openldap on alpha

On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 04:09:41PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000 dan@mid-hudson.com wrote:
> > In my unprofessional opinion, I would say that it should be increased.
> > Under any load openldap might as well not work with this as a problem.
> > There was a stable release on 5/15 and this bug has been around for longer
> > then that, so it seems as if it has be disregarded.  I'm not sure how this
> > works when the problem seems to be upstream though.
> It has been upgraded and I believe David is sending a note to the
> maintainer with an offer to NMU it (my recommendation).  I'm recompiling
> it now and will forward a URL to fetch the new packages when I'm done.
> > I'm not sure what release of 1.2.10 the patch was created from, but it
> > doesn't seem to apply to the latest stable or release, so I have not been
> > able to test it.  This leaves me in kind of an awkward position. =P
> > Suggestions?
> I just tested it and David is correct (as is the patch).  You'll have new
> debs in the next 30 mins :-)

Do not NMU. I have a new openldap package with Dave's patch already that
also includes some other things.


/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '

Reply to: