Re: groff/troff

To: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>
Cc: Alpha Debian <debian-alpha@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: groff/troff
From: David Huggins-Daines <dhd@linuxcare.com>
Date: 26 Apr 2000 22:35:13 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k8hknue6.fsf@tarwebok.thepuffingroup.com>
In-reply-to: Paul Slootman's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:33:53 +0200"
References: <20000420004716.A4639@mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <[🔎] 20000420223353.A12855@wau.mis.ah.nl>

Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl> writes:

> Often ltrace is better for debugging. However, unfortunately it doesn't
> compile on alpha :-( :-(

More precisely it doesn't contain the requisite architecture-dependent
support, nor any support for ELF64 binaries, actually.

I'm thinking of working on this if I get a chance.

-- 
David Huggins-Daines, Senior Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc.
613.223.0225 mobile
dhd@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: groff/troff
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: groff/troff
Next by Date: Bug#63183: [PATCH] 'struct dynamic' is actually ELF32 specific, breaks ldconfig
Previous by thread: Re: groff/troff
Next by thread: boot-floppies 2.2.11 for Alpha building now, testers needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread