Re: t1lib0
On Wed 09 Feb 2000, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > I guess this means that grace and xpdf need to be recompiled....
> > Luckily xpdf is out of date anyway; grace isn't, unfortunately.
> > I'll have a look this evening (and check for any others that depend on
> > t1lib0).
>
> Hm, I thought grace was recompiled for t1lib1. The maintainer (either Guy
> or Enrique, I believe) has been mostly absent for a while, and didn't
> respond to my e-mails advising of the t1lib change (I'm the t1lib
> maintainer) but I could have sworn someone else was going to recompile it.
I've just uploaded version 5.0.5-1.2.0 to frozen and unstable;
it was indeed still depending on t1lib0. Maybe the autobuilder
got to it sooner and still had t1lib0-dev installed?
xpdf is also uploaded, as is bock (which depended on libgc4 which isn't
in debian/alpha anymore; now it depends on libgc5).
Paul Slootman
--
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: paul@murphy.nl http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: paul@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: paul@isdn4linux.de http://www.isdn4linux.de/
Reply to:
- References:
- t1lib0
- From: Luke Shulenburger <sluke@bartender.mit.edu>
- Re: t1lib0
- From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>
- Re: t1lib0
- From: David Huggins-Daines <dhd@eradicator.org>