Re: ddd
On Fri 03 Dec 1999, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> On 3 Dec 1999, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think it goes away with less optimization. But using a newer
> > compiler seems better to me, less hassle to find out where the flags
> > are set (setting CXXFLAGS does not work...)
>
> Either way. I'm used to hunting for -O2's, so it's no big deal. Either
> way, I end up compiling it :-P
I recently ended up writing a gcc wrapper script that matched the *.c
file that was being compiled, and then selectively changed -O2 to -O :-)
Put that in a directory at the beginning of $PATH, and make sure it
execs the *real* gcc (I learned the hard way :-).
Paul Slootman
--
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: paul@murphy.nl http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: paul@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: paul@isdn4linux.de http://www.isdn4linux.de/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: ddd
- From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: ddd
- From: Christopher C Chimelis <chris@debian.org>