Re: [non-i386 people needed] Proposed packages for 2.1r4
On Fri 26 Nov 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Still missing (sorry, I had some updates to the list):
> >From ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/slink-proposed-updates
> [*] bind_8.2.2p5-0slink1.1
> - security fix
> [MISSING: sparc, m68k, alpha]
> [*] nfs-server_2.2beta37-1slink.1
> - fix buffer overflow.
> [MISSING: alpha]
OK, I'll do these Monday.
> -- from ~vincent/2.1r4 on master:
> [*] kernel-source-2.0.38_2.0.38-0_i386
> - misc important fixes
> [MISSING: m68k, sparc, alpha]
Hmm, difficult I think; on alpha each subarchitecture needs its own
kernel image, at least with 2.0 kernels (2.2 kernels have a "generic"
type for alpha finally). I expect most people build their own kernels
anyway... And many have already a 2.2 kernel (I did, even in slink
times). Maybe a generic 2.2 kernel image for alpha? I think the
importance of the "misc important fixes" should be looked at, possibly
this is more trouble than it's worth...
I've cc'ed the debian-alpha list about this, maybe others have their
opinions on this?
home: email@example.com http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: email@example.com http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.isdn4linux.de/