[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [chris@beezer.med.miami.edu: Re: What's wrong with bluefish?]



ok, I've got a solution here...
revert back to the old fugly way of doing it. It takes the pointers out of
the menu stuff and sticks them elsewhere which would allow this to work
correctly. although I don't like doing this, at least I can inflict
bluefish on alphas now ;)

-Chris Mazuc

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> 
> > eek, that would be one hell of a compiler bug...
> 
> Actually, upon further review, it seems I'm wrong again (geez, big
> shock...I seem to be wrong alot today).  It's not the compiler
> misinterpreting at all.  It seems that it just doesn't like the cast (and
> for good reason....it shouldn't work at all according to standards).  I
> substituted an integer for the quote (I used 999) and it worked fine.  I
> also removed the ampersand from another line and got the same error that
> it was throwing before.  In short, until the menus are implemented more
> properly, I don't think we'll ever get this compiled on Alpha.
> 
> > GTK most definitely is a magic box. put stuff in, different stuff comes
> > out and it worked somehow.
> 
> I guess now's the time to figure out how it worked :-)  It seems that some
> back-end assumptions were being made on the i386-compiled code, but the
> Alpha compiler must be more picky about making such assumptions.  Either
> that or the GTK code itself somehow behaves slightly differently on
> certain archs.
> 
> > Well, I was actually planning on getting one as my next computer, not sure
> > where I'm gonna get the cash though.. heh
> 
> They're not bad if you get them on eBay.  I built a nice 164SX 533MHz
> machine for a hair over $500 (I did have a nice SCSI hard drive
> already,though, which saved me some $$$).
> 
> C
> 


Reply to: