Re: seti@home alpha-linux version available
On Wednesday, 19 May, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> Well, the subject says it all really, but whomever did the port targeted
> an EV5, FYI.
For a generic binary, that should be fine. See the comments to the
compilation flags for a generic Linux kernel:
# If GENERIC, make sure to turn off any instruction set extensions that
# the host compiler might have on by default. Given that EV4 and EV5
# have the same instruction set, prefer EV5 because an EV5 schedule is
# more likely to keep an EV4 processor busy than vice-versa.