Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable

To: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable
From: Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:45:57 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990326104557.A1138@snowball.ucd.ie>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 36FA41F9.29050FF2@msa.dec.com>; from Wai-Sun Chia on Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 10:02:33PM +0800
References: <[🔎] 36FA2171.812E9EF7@msa.dec.com> <[🔎] 19990325125502.B32598@wau.mis.ah.nl> <[🔎] 14074.10199.926326.707248@porto> <[🔎] 36FA41F9.29050FF2@msa.dec.com>

On Thursday, 25 Mar, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
> 
> But strangely enough the stock Slink kernel (2.0.36) _WORKS_ !

The RTC code in 2.0.x is exactly the same as in 2.2.x + rtclight.diff
with CONFIG_RTC and CONFIG_RTC_LIGHT.

Nikita

Reply to:

References:
- Hwclock failure on a Sable
  - From: Wai-Sun Chia <waisun.chia@msa.dec.com>
- Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>
- Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable
  - From: Loic Prylli <Loic.Prylli@ens-lyon.fr>
- Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable
  - From: Wai-Sun Chia <waisun.chia@msa.dec.com>

Prev by Date: Re: elm-me+ segment Violation
Next by Date: Re: Question
Previous by thread: Re: Hwclock failure on a Sable
Next by thread: ALPHA 1200 + slink [I can't boot!]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread