Re: glibc and associated packages in incoming
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hrm, when you get a working fakeroot I can install glibc2.1 on saens and
> you guys can start testing things out without wrecking your home systems..
> But it is pretty useless without a working fakeroot :<
Agreed. I should probably have it by Thursday at the latest. It looks
trivial, but you never know with that code (it's ugly).
> Does APT order this installation correctly if you ask it to simply install
> ibc6.1? We definately should try to get the dependencys/conflicts worked
> out from the start!
I'm not sure. That's the one thing I didn't try yet. I'm really just
mentioning it since the x86'ers were complaining about that.
> Hmm, I belive the latest 0.1 series fixed a small segfault on the alphas,
> not sure. 0.3.2 should hit incoming soon which I know works on the alpha,
> I did lots and lots of testing on saens.
Great. So far, no segfaults (am running it now). I believe it just
needed it's dynamic linking fixed to the new situation.
C
Reply to: