Re: Patch for smail
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 10:29:43AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> The first time was sourceless, the second time _with_ source (and
> preferably also i386 binary). They'll notice the source and the binary
> in i386 changing, while they'll usually not notice an upload with an NMU
> version number to an arch they don't use.
Brian rejected the i386 part (source and binary). The alpha part got in
though. The comment was "upload for alpha only". So I'll try to talk to the
maintener again... :)
(And BTS)
B.
Reply to: