Re: more bugs
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:22:07 +0200, you scribbled:
<snip alan cox patches info>
>He's currently at pre-patch-6, which I'm running on my intel, but my
>alpha is still at pre-patch-2.
>
i had a quick look at the site and am confused about what to use. i take it
one gets a vanilla kernel source, untars it, then patches these over the top
like a normal patch?
the other question is, which one to use? is a patch-2.x.xx-pre2 an earlier
revision than a patch-2.x.xx-pre6 ?
*wave*
"On the other hand, O'Reilly's book about running W95 has a toad as the
cover animal. Makes sense; both have lots of warts and croak all the
time." --Michael Kagalenko, 6.Aug.98
Reply to: