Re: XEmacs
On 29 Oct 1998, Brederlow wrote:
> Do you still have the source? Could you make a diff please. Even a tar
> ball or rpm of the bin would be usefull. Better than using vi, which
> does a screen update every 4 chars only. :)
>
> By the way, is that the normal behaviour of vi on alpha?
No, it's not. In fact, I use vi almost exclusively on my Alpha (low
memory installed) and it's fine. It updates every char as expected.
Maybe it's kernel or video card related?
C
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: XEmacs
- From: Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>