RE: kernel diff package
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Guenter Geiger wrote:
> Probably it would be nice if we offered an 2.1 version too.
> Are there any suggestions which version to use (if not the latest) ?
Agreed. 2.1.123 has been known to lock up on quite a few Alphas, so
barring anyone's knowledge of a patch, we should probably go with an
earlier (or later if it exists) version.
> I will just use -O (as already mentioned on the list), until egcs can
> cope again.
It may be soon. I'm working with someone on getting an egcs-ss package
going again. Supposedly, the latest snapshot works on the "problem
children" that we've encountered recently.
C
Reply to: