Re: UDB and Hamm? How stable is Hamm?
On Tue 09 Jun 1998, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>
> Don't bother with RH---the release of Debian 2.0 for Alpha may lag a bit
Agreed!
> compared to the Intel, but that is almost exclusively a matter of the fact
> that we're perpetually playing catch-up. Every package on the FTP site that
> I've installed in the last several months has simply worked. There are some
... besides a certain version of dpkg (fixed now), and sp. But
everything else was as good as I've come to expect with Debian.
> things that don't compile, but they're usually less-popular packages that
> you wouldn't find under RedHat, either.
I'm having trouble with wu-ftpd-academ; they do stuff with varargs (or
was it stdargs) which ecgs' stricter checking won't compile, while the
i386 gcc simply builds it :-(
Paul Slootman
--
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: