Re: Fresh hamm install

[miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)]

In article <[🔎] 19980210103652.16217@wau.mis.ah.nl>,
Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl> wrote:
>BTW, why does procps depend on libbfd-2.8.blabla, while that package
>isn't available *anywhere* ?  I understand that nothing should depend on
>the shared libbfd anyway, right?  Is there a new procps in the works? I
>want to be able to use "ps" again :-(

I just made it a link to libbfd-2.7.blabla and that works. It appears that
even though ps is linked with libbfd, it isn't using it anyway.

Mike.
-- 
 Miquel van Smoorenburg |  The dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac lay in his bed
    miquels@cistron.nl  |  awake all night wondering if there is a doG


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .