Re: Does this break glibc2 support?
On Monday, 29 Sep, Nikhil Nair wrote:
>
> I then had a look at alpha-patches-0.2. I've generated a patch to go from
> 0.1 to 0.2, hopefully keeping the glibc2 compatibility which was reversed
> in 0.1. Could someone have a look through to make sure this doesn't have
> any glibc2 problems? I don't know what to look for.
>
Thanks for the patch. I do not see any glibc2 problems in it.
> With one exception, it applied cleanly to my patched tree: someone had
> kindly corrected two spelling mistakes in comments, which broke the
> context of one hunk! AAARGH!!! Anyway, the patch I enclose below is the
> one for our tree, which differs by all of *two bytes* from the
> autogenerated alpha-patches-0.1-0.2 one.
That hunk (drivers/sound/Config.in) is actually of limited use. The
sound driver's author warned that it might not work with some audio
cards. I left that hunk out. Besides, it needs a small change to allow
full duplex on MSS cards.
>
> BTW, I've been running this kernel (patched with Nikita's stuff, my
> corrections and ap0.2) since this morning - seems to be stable.
Good. Don't worry about the patches I announced today - they basically
repeat your setup. I was just cleaning up my ap-2.0.30.diff.
Nikita
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: