Re: Problem with 2.1.43 kernel
Christopher C Chimelis writes:
> I've heard of this with older MILO's before, so you may want to upgrade,
> BUT don't use a 2.1 MILO yet. I've heard really bad things that way and
> have personally stuck to my 2.0.30 version of MILO for quite some time
I tried 2.0.30 and pre2.0.31 .. no success
I couldn't compile a 2.1 milo version ( header file problems )
I am able to boot 2.1.13 to a certain degree though, but slowly I'm
getting tired of compiling every kernel that's available ....
> If that's not the issue, then I'm alot more stumped :)
Is anybody out there with a PC164 and working 2.1.?? kernels.
Anyway, I think I have too look at Redhat's ...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .