Re: Urgent: Manipulating large libraries
On Aug 20, Nikhil Nair wrote
> On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 email@example.com wrote:
> Ah .... I've been porting to Linux a multi-arch package. Some platforms
> don't need ranlib, I wasn't aware that Linux was one of them. Am I now
> right in thinking that, if I use the -s modifier to ar, I never need
Almost certainly. I had been given the impression that GNU ar Simply
Took Care of That, and had never heard the s switch mentioned---but
from reading the docs it certainly sounds like using the s switch
guarantees that ranlib is not needed.
I just suggested that because, if I remember correctly (and I'm too
lazy to check), the configure script in many GNU tools substitutes
/bin/true for ranlib when GNU ar is selected
> > 4) Unless you're talking a dramatic difference in processor speed,
> > always get more memory.
> Right, I'm now down to a generality (ranlib worries out of the way). The
> choice is:
> 366MHz 21164, 1MB cache, 128MB DRAM;
> 433MHz 21164, 2MB cache (Microway claim 30% performance boost), 64MB
> Any thoughts? I'll probably have to decide tomorrow ...
Unless your app is *totally* memory or I/O intensive, like heavy-duty
database work, get the 433, definitely.
My thinking is that big L2 cache plus the additional speed should make
any moderately CPU-intensive stuff quite a big faster, and as long as
your active working set isn't significantly more than maybe 56MB or
so, you shouldn't be swapping excessively.
Don't touch that! It's the History Eraser Button
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .