Re: help! (continues)
On 3 Jun 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Hmmm. Those are (or should be) in gcc, in:
Yup. One could think once for a while and let 'find' do some work too :)
> Why they're in libc, too? I'm not sure. Must investigate.
Dunno. i was just looking i386-version and those are included there
in libc5-dev, so i was obviously looking those from libc6.1-dev ;)
Anyway, i couldn't compile working one with the scripts, so i
just stripped all the 'unneeded' (same as script is stripping)
symbols out of the /lib/libc.so.6.1 and dumped that in to the rootdisk.
That solved something, but now dinstall is looping madly in endless loop
and i feel quite tired already -> i'll look it tomorrow again (actually today)
PS. i think that RedHat's ramdisk libc is made quite same way as it's
quite same size and dynamic too.
-- firstname.lastname@example.org -- http://www.iki.fi/upi/
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .