Hi all, Christian Kastner, on 2024-03-13: > On 2024-03-13 16:57, Cordell Bloor wrote: > > I was talking with Petter about the rocdbgapi package and he suggested > > two changes that might apply to all the ROCm packages: > > > > 1. Add d/gbp.conf with pristine-tar = True. > > Sounds good. I guess we all have our own .gbp.conf tweaked but new > contributors will trip over this (as you've pointed out to me). > > I'd probably also add patch-numbers = False for packages that don't have > numbered patches. Seconded, I often resort to package local d/gbp.conf to adjust to differing teams policies requirements, so I don't have to think too much about these implementation details. > > 2. Add the upstream maintainer email to the package information (after > > verifying that it is being monitored). > > Sounds fine either way, but just to clarify, do you mean to the package > description, or the "Upstream-Contact" field of d/copyright? It could be it. I also found a Security-Contact field in the d/upstream/metadata file of python-biopython, but I don't believe it is as much used as the d/copyriright field. > > These seem pretty reasonable to me. Any thoughts on adopting them across > > the board? > > Thumbs up from me. Thumbs up from me as well. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/3, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Althea - The Art of Trees
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature