Hi Cory, Cordell Bloor, on 2022-08-27: > The current upstream sources in the debian repo [1] are based on ROCm 5.0.0. > Support for an FHS-compatible layout came in ROCm 5.2 (when building with > -DBUILD_FILE_REORG_BACKWARD_COMPATIBILITY=OFF), so I would recommend > updating the rocRAND sources. The release candidate branch for ROCm 5.3 has > been created [2], but there's almost no changes for rocRAND [3] so there's > no need to wait. Thanks for checking and the pointers as always, I also see ROCm 5.2.3 is out and most of the toolchain maybe welcome a refresh. A few weeks ago, I begun a push of some of the lower level packages until one caused a rocm-hipamd build failure, so upgrade might continue in experimental for the time being. > The current version of hipcc is an experimental package is based on ROCm > 5.0.0, but I believe that should be sufficient for building rocRAND from > ROCm 5.2. As such, all dependencies required for packaging rocrand are > currently available and packaged. Though, I suppose that rocrand would have > to be experimental because hipcc is experimental. hipcc 5.0 has been lingering in experimental for some time. Maybe it is a good time to put it in more hands. I consider doing an upload to unstable tomorrow or this weekend depending on the amount of tasks I have to catch up after vacations. To day, rocm-hipamd builds alright in unstable, and artifacts are perfectly capable of running rocrand 5.0 test suite from this evening's quick check. > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocrand/-/tree/upstream/5.0.0 > [2]: > https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/rocRAND/tree/release/rocm-rel-5.3 > [3]: https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/rocRAND/compare/rocm-5.2.0...release/rocm-rel-5.3 Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity. On air: Six by six - Yearning to Fly
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature