On 2022-02-19 20:45 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 03:29 +0000, Wookey wrote: > I only found one doc-build in the mail and did not figure out > another doc-build to be compared... > > But if you mean doxygen vs sphinx ... doxygen is likely for C++, > and sphinx is surely for python. That is what I meant. I didn't know that sphinx did python documentation (I thought it was just a general documentation system written in python). > We should have a python3-tvm as it's the language interface used by their > official starter examples. C++ does not make any starter example in > the ML/DL fields. > > If you look into TensorFlow, PyTorch, etc, you will find all of them > write terrible documentation for their C++ interface. Their first > priority is the documentation for python interface. > > If we have to choose one from doxygen and sphinx documentation to > drop ... just drop doxygen. The python doc is much more useful > than C++ documentation generally. That's a pity as the doxygen doc-build is much more straightforward than the sphinx one, which needs two new packages and dealing with this inventory download. But point taken: The python interface is not optional here. Cheers for the pointers. More next week. Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature