On 01.12.20 19:54, Steffen Möller wrote: > On debian-ai we are wondering about how to tag packages that need > Debian's cuda packages installed to build, i.e. for their runtime tests. > That said, is possibly the mere addition of a cuda package as build > dependency sufficient to point to a particular subset of buildds? > > The number of packages in need of a CUDA-savvy buildd I expect to be > less than 20 in 2020 from debian-ai and also for Debian Med I only have > about two packages in mind that would make immediate use of CUDA. > > Since packages needing a non-free autobuild need to register anyway, > maybe there is not too much overhead for a support of CUDA on the > non-free buildd? I would be prepared to help with a machine if that is a > blocker. Please try contacting the wanna-build team proper and/or file a bug. The non-free infrastructure is a simple allowlist and you are not even allowed to build-depend on non-free packages for building to work. So I don't think anything here can be easily supported right now. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature