Re: plan of deep learning team for next stable release?
Hi Mo,
thanks also to you.
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > I remember there was some connection requests from Tensorflow devs
> > searching for Debian devs ... did that get any followup from any side? I
> > haven't seen anything.
>
> Nothing new on my side, neither.
Should we try to warm up that? Anyone here has interest in tensorflow?
Actually I **do** have, but I don't have any experience about building
it, so I didn't answer, but I think it would be a waste to waste this
option.
Should I connect them?
> There are many implementations of SYCL. I'd personally wait for Intel's
> implementation to be merged into LLVM:
>
> https://github.com/intel/llvm
Ok!
> Agreed. Given the limited time frame and man power before the release,
> ROCm does not look like something for stable+1 at all.
Optimistically stable+1
> As for shipping julia-lts and julia-latest simultaneously, I doubt
> whether it is necessary given the current popcon record? The embedded
Good point, thanks. Appreciated. I guess for now we ship julia-latest as
"julia", and might revisit this for stable+1
Best
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Reply to: