[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PyTorch landed onto archive



Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>> In the email thread about transferring some packages from d-science, you
>> indicate that you need help with arm64 (and potentially other?)
>> arches. Could you elaborate on this?
>
> Simply two problems to investigate:
>
> (1) https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/tree/master/third_party 
>     is the "neon2sse" dependency necessary for us?
>
> (2) https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onednn
>     intel says onednn has some experimental support for arm64, but the
> 	build system still picks x86 intrinsics while building on arm64.
> 	should we try to fix it or directly drop it from the arm64 build?
>
> 	FYI: pytorch depends on ideep; ideep depends on onednn. ideep/onednn
> 	is optional for the pytorch build.
>
> I'm personally not interested in arm* hardware. So anybody that cares
> about the arm64 build are not recommended to fully rely on me.

Thanks for the summary!

 -- Gard
 


Reply to: