Re: PyTorch landed onto archive
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> In the email thread about transferring some packages from d-science, you
> indicate that you need help with arm64 (and potentially other?)
> arches. Could you elaborate on this?
Simply two problems to investigate:
(1) https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/tree/master/third_party
is the "neon2sse" dependency necessary for us?
(2) https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onednn
intel says onednn has some experimental support for arm64, but the
build system still picks x86 intrinsics while building on arm64.
should we try to fix it or directly drop it from the arm64 build?
FYI: pytorch depends on ideep; ideep depends on onednn. ideep/onednn
is optional for the pytorch build.
I'm personally not interested in arm* hardware. So anybody that cares
about the arm64 build are not recommended to fully rely on me.
Reply to: