[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Configuation management



Previously Oscar Levi wrote:
> What is see is a very aggressive design proposal.  I'm not in for such
> a direction at the moment because I want something that will work in a
> couple of weeks and will solve the really tough problems I experience
> as an SA.

Ah, we are talking about very different things. This design is meant
for configuration when installing or upgrading a package only. What
you are talking about is more what COAS and Linuxconf is mean to do:
managing configuration of installed software. COAS currently does 1,
2, 5, 4 to some degree. Linuxconf is also usefull here and I think it
does everything you mentioned. It's even packaged (in experimental).

> Let me state that I think it is a good idea to rethink SA from
> scratch.  I expect that the only intelligent way to do it, though, is
> to provide a library against which applications can link. Then we can
> deb-admin-ify applications one by one.

You really want to make everything Debian-specific? I object *very*
strongly to that approach.

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgp2Mjo_OEW92.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: