[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Weird behavior with mates top panel



Hello Kenneth,

Yes, when you land on the "Applications/Places/System" menu, arrowing will navigate the menu, just like any regular application's menu. This can get a bit odd when you were arrowing over the other panel items before, though.

The way you're supposed to deal with this is either only use Tab to go from item to item, or use it only to escape the menu: once you're on the menu, hit Escape to close the menus, then Tab to go to the next item.

I think this has always been the behavior of this menu, and feel like it's consistent with regular menus. However, if there's a compelling reason supported my enough people, it might be something that can be changed in the future I guess.

Regarding Alt+F1: yes, it opens the main menu, but does *not* focus the top panel. The idea is that the focus should go back to where it was before you triggered Alt+F1 once the menu closes.

Regards,
Colomban

Le 20/04/2025 à 11:59, Kenneth a écrit :
Hi,

I've noticed something odd, that i think is a odd behaviour.

When i log in to my Debian 12.10 bookworm, and press ctrl + alt + tab to get focus on the top panel, i experiece a weird behaviour, that if i press right arrow, i get to the one side and left to the other side (That part is no weird), but, if i keep pressing multiple times either left or right i will always be stuck on the one with "programs, places and system menu". Im not able to get back to the calendar, wifi, battery etc. unless i press ctrl + alt + tab and must sometimes change focus to the desktop or bottom panel and then again back to the top panel to be able to get to the menus in the top panel with battery, calendar, wifi etc..

Can someone confirm this weird behaviour, and or maby know if its me who is doing something wrong? I can access the menu with "programs, places and system settings by pressing "alt + F1" but this does not let me get access to "battery, calender, wifi etc."

Best kind regards
Kenneth



Reply to: