Hi, Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2016-01-01): > Hello, > > Cyril Brulebois, on Fri 01 Jan 2016 17:21:28 +0100, wrote: > > Debian FTP Masters <email@example.com> (2015-12-26): > > > espeakup (1:0.71-20) unstable; urgency=medium > > > . > > > * espeakup-udeb.sh: Preseed installing MATE desktop by default when espeakup > > > is used in d-i. > > > * compat: Bump to 9. > > > * rules: Clear. > > > * patches: Switch to 3.0 patch system. > > > > is leaving changes from 1:0.71-19 aside expected? > > Oops. Actually, yes and no. The -19 change was meant as a workaround > for Jessie, and the underlying race to be fixed for Stretch, but the > latter hasn't happened yet. So I have now uploaded a -22 which does > include the -19 changes, so that we have the workaround until we fix the > underlying race. ACK; I only followed this remotely so I wasn't absolutely sure, thanks for the full story. Since there aren't too many other changes I wanted to wait on (basically only flash-kernel), and since the changes are fairly new, I've decided not to rush things for espeakup (so that it would have been included into the upcoming d-i release). > > Having a rewritten changelog entry showing up in “d espeakup” was a > > bit strange so I thought I'd ask (I don't quite get what's expected > > to be in the debian-jessie, debian, and master branches). > > debian-jessie is the Jessie branch . The debian branch is not supposed > to exist. OK. :) > Thanks for the proofread, > Samuel You're welcome. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature