Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:01:52
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
To: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Cc: Debian Accessibility Team <debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: espeakup_0.71-20_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, on Fri 01 Jan 2016 17:21:28 +0100, wrote:
Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> (2015-12-26):
espeakup (1:0.71-20) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* espeakup-udeb.sh: Preseed installing MATE desktop by default when espeakup
is used in d-i.
* compat: Bump to 9.
* rules: Clear.
* patches: Switch to 3.0 patch system.
is leaving changes from 1:0.71-19 aside expected?
Oops. Actually, yes and no. The -19 change was meant as a workaround
for Jessie, and the underlying race to be fixed for Stretch, but the
latter hasn't happened yet. So I have now uploaded a -22 which does
include the -19 changes, so that we have the workaround until we fix the
underlying race.
Having a rewritten
changelog entry showing up in ?d espeakup? was a bit strange so I
thought I'd ask (I don't quite get what's expected to be in the
debian-jessie, debian, and master branches).
debian-jessie is the Jessie branch . The debian branch is not supposed
to exist.
Thanks for the proofread,
Samuel