Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Do we target atspi2 integration?
That is a very good question I've been asking myself as well.
I guess it ultimately depends on what upstream (GNOME) plans are to
migrate to at-spi2. In any case, there is work to do on at-spi2
before it can fully replace at-spi, so if someone is interested in
seeing at-spi2 in Squeeze, I guess what you can do is help upstream
*now* by installing the preliminary packages and fixing bugs / testing.
For instance, I can't get iceweasel nor epiphany-webkit to export any
document content via at-spi2 right now.
If we are still targeting december 2009, I am pretty sure there is no way
at-spi2 will be ready enough for us to include it in squeeze though.
BTW, we need someone working on the Qt side of at-spi2.
I.e., packaging qspiaccessiblebridge and possibly getting necessary
patches applied to Debian packaging of Qt.
⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
.''`. | Get my public key via finger email@example.com
: :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
`- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/>
- Re: at-spi2
- From: Willie Walker <William.Walker@Sun.COM>