[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> writes:

> Do we target atspi2 integration?

That is a very good question I've been asking myself as well.
I guess it ultimately depends on what upstream (GNOME) plans are to
migrate to at-spi2.  In any case, there is work to do on at-spi2
before it can fully replace at-spi, so if someone is interested in
seeing at-spi2 in Squeeze, I guess what you can do is help upstream
*now* by installing the preliminary packages and fixing bugs / testing.
For instance, I can't get iceweasel nor epiphany-webkit to export any
document content via at-spi2 right now.

If we are still targeting december 2009, I am pretty sure there is no way
at-spi2 will be ready enough for us to include it in squeeze though.

BTW, we need someone working on the Qt side of at-spi2.
I.e., packaging qspiaccessiblebridge and possibly getting necessary
patches applied to Debian packaging of Qt.

  ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
  .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/key@db.debian.org
 : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
 `. `'
   `-      <URL:http://delysid.org/>  <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/>

Reply to: