New Gnopernicus in experimental
Hi.
I just uploaded gnopernicus 0.9.19 to "experimental". If you are
adventerous and have some free time, please give it a whirl and
let us know about your results, especially differences to the
current version 0.8.4 in unstable. Is anything broken that
worked before? Does something work now which never worked before?
Add
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main
to /etc/apt/source.list and run
# apt-get install -t experimental gnopernicus
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:15:34 +0100
Source: gnopernicus
Binary: gnopernicus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.19-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mario Lang <mlang@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mario Lang <mlang@debian.org>
Description:
gnopernicus - Screen reader for GNOME 2
Closes: 270879
Changes:
gnopernicus (0.9.19-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Fix invalid OMF files (Closes: Bug#270879).
* Tighten Build-Depends for at-spi.
* Build-Depend on libgnome-mag-dev (currently only in experimental).
* Backport ttybrl.c to BrlAPI from BRLTTY 3.4.1.
Files:
4e90fe6c795e59a9a1716ba491609ac7 997 x11 optional gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.dsc
a652ec8ae07839da20163296d0edc43b 3163856 x11 optional gnopernicus_0.9.19.orig.tar.gz
8bb86c12bfc76e28c6449879cda0b99f 69448 x11 optional gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.diff.gz
02caad7385f948b7959d1df595489f4a 1635546 x11 optional gnopernicus_0.9.19-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB1Ew73/wCKmsRPkQRAqynAJwNliqWkLrrW/pgfyMHXzXQA1DcrQCfYYFA
kyZgOAVKTa4RaAx2B0jQ+Fs=
=Qpfy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.diff.gz
gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_0.9.19-1.dsc
gnopernicus_0.9.19-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_0.9.19-1_i386.deb
gnopernicus_0.9.19.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_0.9.19.orig.tar.gz
--- End Message ---
--
CYa,
Mario
Reply to: