[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?

On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Steve McIntyre wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
> >all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
> >confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
> >noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
> >clearly meant to be discussing the debian-ports setup itself rather
> >than individual ports, and that's also off-topic for those ports that
> >are in the main archive. So, I propose:
> >
> > * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
> >   mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it as they
> >   see fit normally. This would be specifically for "discussions about
> >   ports.debian.org and architectures hosted there".
> >
> > * Explicitly do *not* add another exploder to replace the old
> >   address: instead, *if* we want something to cover this use case,
> >   add a new list that interested people can subscribe to. Maybe
> >   "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something. Please
> >   feel free to suggest a better name! If such a list were to be set
> >   up, we could/should encourage existing architecture porters to sign
> >   up there too.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> Any dissenting opinions?
> Listmasters - are you happy to change things like I propose?
Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
listmaster side? 


Reply to: