Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
>all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
>confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
>noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
>clearly meant to be discussing the debian-ports setup itself rather
>than individual ports, and that's also off-topic for those ports that
>are in the main archive. So, I propose:
> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
> mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it as they
> see fit normally. This would be specifically for "discussions about
> ports.debian.org and architectures hosted there".
> * Explicitly do *not* add another exploder to replace the old
> address: instead, *if* we want something to cover this use case,
> add a new list that interested people can subscribe to. Maybe
> "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something. Please
> feel free to suggest a better name! If such a list were to be set
> up, we could/should encourage existing architecture porters to sign
> up there too.
Any dissenting opinions?
Listmasters - are you happy to change things like I propose?
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. email@example.com
Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,
Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to
concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud.