dak and dpo mini-dak behaviour (was Re: Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else))

To: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Cc: Ondrej Riha <ondrej.riha@outlook.com>
Subject: dak and dpo mini-dak behaviour (was Re: Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else))
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:47:40 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1404010846180.25037@herc.mirbsd.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 533A701C.8000506@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
References: <[🔎] DUB127-W24F5C754E564DFF7BEC76DF8620@phx.gbl> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1404010734130.14701@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 533A701C.8000506@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>

schmitz dixit:

> Didn't dak use to do that, too?

I’ve got no idea; I was a Debian user back in slink times when APT
was new and highly experimental and discouraged ;) and then only
in modern times. Lots of BSD in between, though.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<theftf> Ich gebs zu, jupp ist cool
	-- theftf zu Natureshadow beim Fixen von Debian

Reply to:

References:
- Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else)
  - From: Ondrej Riha <ondrej.riha@outlook.com>
- Re: Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else)
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else)
  - From: schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Atari kernel-in-FastRAM patches, take three
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Atari kernel-in-FastRAM patches, take three
Previous by thread: Re: Problem with packages version(on m68k architecture, but also on amd64 and maybe somewhere else)
Next by thread: New buildd hardware
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread