Re: BigRamPlus arrived

[Michael Schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>]

Geert,

> > Might be cleanest - please bump the bootinfo version in that case so 
> > we can
> > fall back to some default logic if the device tree is absent.
>
> Oops, I forgot to insert the obligatory smiley.

Do tell ... I was briefly wondering about that. Weirder things have 
happened.

> I don't think it's worth the effort to add DT support for the existing
> platforms.
> If we *have* to, we can handle it in a boot wrapper. All information 
> is in the
> existing bootinfo and arch/m68k/<mach>/config.c.

So order of appearance in bootinfo == order of priority?

Which reminds me - I still need to test making a chunk of ST-RAM 
available to atafb via ioremap(), for a quick fix to the TT boot 
problems.

Cheers,

	Michael




> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- 
> geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a 
> hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something 
> like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds