Re: buildds screwed?
On 2013-05-13 14:38, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> Could be a kernel issue with '060s.
> Thats what I want to hear! And now that our kernel hacker is
listening, what
> can we do to track this down and fix it?
If there are no problems with older kernels, you can try to bisect
it.
Ingo, what was the last working one, something from etch,
2.6.something I
guess?
Well, when we built the last packages before we started short before
christmas again? 4 years ago? So I guess it was some 2.6 kernel, maybe
2.6.39, but I'm not sure... let's have a look into the database:
id | packagename | version
| dist | arch | begin |
endtime | buildd | state
--------+--------------------------------------+--------------------------------+----------+------+----------------------------+----------------------------+---------+------------------
187257 | libgee | 0.5.0-3
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 21:31:46.819228 | 2010-03-09
21:52:03.330563 | arrakis | maybe-successful
187254 | libgda4 | 4.0.7-1
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 21:25:10.46755 | 2010-03-09
21:31:46.745298 | arrakis | maybe-successful
187249 | libg15render | 1.3.0~svn316-2.1
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 20:05:04.06684 | 2010-03-09
21:25:10.343751 | arrakis | maybe-successful
187242 | libfishsound | 0.9.2-3
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 19:14:10.436685 | 2010-03-09
20:05:03.985448 | arrakis | maybe-successful
187241 | libextractor | 1:0.5.23+dfsg-7
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 19:04:33.925975 | 2010-03-09
19:07:05.824475 | arrakis | maybe-successful
187240 | libexif | 0.6.19-1
| unstable | m68k | 2010-03-09 19:00:50.947934 | 2010-03-09
19:04:33.829453 | arrakis | maybe-successful
So, arrakis has built the last packages in March 2010. Looking at the
stats table:
dtstamp | buildd | uptime | users |
lavg | memtotal | memfree | swaptotal | swapfree
----------------------------+---------+----------------+-------+-------------------+----------+---------+-----------+----------
2010-03-10 21:26:19.974452 | arrakis | 638 days 5:33 | 2 | 0.30
0.15 0.08 | 127136 | 19880 | 880568 | 865628
2010-03-10 15:26:16.684836 | arrakis | 637 days 23:33 | 2 | 0.08
0.06 0.01 | 127136 | 4208 | 880568 | 865628
2010-03-10 09:26:26.079167 | arrakis | 637 days 17:33 | 2 | 0.14
0.10 0.23 | 127136 | 4520 | 880568 | 865628
So there was an uptime of >600 days for Arrakis in March 2010. Now,
we're getting close:
arrakis:~# uprecords
# Uptime | System
Boot up
----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
1 653 days, 00:46:51 | Linux 2.6.24-m68k Tue Jun 10
14:24:05 2008
2 430 days, 19:38:42 | Linux 2.6.12-1-amiga Thu Apr 15
16:23:20 2010
3 146 days, 20:00:33 | Linux 2.2.20 Thu Feb 19
17:47:23 2004
4 104 days, 22:46:55 | Linux 2.2.20 Wed Jul 13
12:32:32 2005
5 94 days, 11:49:04 | Linux 2.2.20 Fri Nov 5
11:41:28 2004
6 80 days, 03:48:06 | Linux 2.6.12-1-amiga Thu Aug 10
08:47:42 2028
7 75 days, 19:23:32 | Linux 2.2.20 Sun Jun 15
23:54:54 2003
8 71 days, 22:17:36 | Linux 2.6.24-m68k Sat Mar 8
14:38:39 2008
9 71 days, 21:35:17 | Linux 3.2.0-2-amiga Sun Jul 22
15:15:35 2012
10 68 days, 19:15:18 | Linux 2.6.12-1-amiga Sun Dec 23
18:27:33 2007
So, I would say: the last well-working kernel seems to be Linux
2.6.24-m68k which ran for 653 days on Arrakis.
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
. Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.
Reply to: