Re: Bug#719484: boost1.54: FTBFS: assertion fail in bjam, possibly invalid/unportable alignment assumptions
Mikael Pettersson dixit:
>I've reported this to boost <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8993> together
>with a bug analysis and a patch. With the patch I was able to build boost_1_54_0
>on one of my aranym VMs, although the build took forever.
Oh thanks. Yes, it always took forever.
>[If you think this reply looks strange, it's because I only see debian's m68k postings
>via their web interface, so I have to save the html and edit it extensively before my
>MUA wants to recognize it as an email it can reply to.]
No problem. I don’t particularily like Debian’s webinterface much,
but at least it allows simple reading unlike the one Debconf mailing
lists use (called “lurker” and a case study in what to NOT do when
designing user interfaces).
What you can do is use GMane:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
It also offers Usenet access:
nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
Messages sent via either Web or NNTP are forwarded to the
mailing list.
Additionally, I use the following little script…
https://www.mirbsd.org/cvs.cgi/contrib/hosted/tg/getarticle?rev=HEAD
… to download articles from GMane by either Message-ID
or gmake.group.name/1234 article number to append it to a
unix/mbox format mailbox which my MUA can then pick up and
immediately reply to with good threading.
Maybe one of these helps?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
Reply to: