[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#717689: Re: linux: please review and merge m68k patch

Dixi quod…

>a lot of testing. I’ll update this bugreport with testing feedback

Finn Thain, can you test this on a Macintosh? It will have to be
a system that already runs Debian though, since this new image
is dependent on Debian’s initrd-creating infrastructure now:

(Or anyone else. This runs on the six flavours we already had,
amiga atari bvme6000 mac68k mvme147 mvme16x plus apollo and q40,
in case someone’s got them and wants to play; the rest could be
enabled, but their kconfig help says they’re instable/untested.)

root@ara2:~ # apt-get --purge install linux-image-3.10-0+m68k.2-m68k
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Starting 2
The following extra packages will be installed:
  initramfs-tools klibc-utils libklibc
Suggested packages:
  bash-completion linux-doc-3.10 debian-kernel-handbook vmelilo fdutils
Recommended packages:
  busybox busybox-initramfs busybox-static
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  initramfs-tools klibc-utils libklibc linux-image-3.10-0+m68k.2-m68k
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 363 not upgraded.
Need to get 6149 kB of archives.
After this operation, 19.1 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports/ unstable/main libklibc m68k 2.0.1-3.1 [54.0 kB]
Get:2 http://www.freewrt.org/~tg/dp/ hacks/dirty linux-image-3.10-0+m68k.2-m68k m68k 3.10.1-1+m68k.2 [5833 kB]
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports/ unstable/main klibc-utils m68k 2.0.1-3.1 [169 kB]
Get:4 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports/ unstable/main initramfs-tools all 0.113 [92.2 kB]
Fetched 6149 kB in 1min 48s (56.8 kB/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...

(It’s in hacks/dirty because it’s cross-compiled.)

(gnutls can also be used, but if you are compiling lynx for your own use,
there is no reason to consider using that package)
	-- Thomas E. Dickey on the Lynx mailing list, about OpenSSL

Reply to: