Re: About gcc builtin atomics
Mikael Pettersson dixit:
>Now we know that aranym had a broken
>CAS emulation :-(
Those problems are gone now though?
>I've always relied on gcc's c, c++, and libgomp test suites when
>testing my attempts to implement atomics in gcc.
*sigh* I guess I’ll port the patches to doko’s latest upload and
build that withOUT nocheck, but the results won’t be in time for
the freeze then. libdrm and mesa built from unchanged sources now,
though. Should I submit the patches to doko right now, or do we
want to chance me maintaining gcc-4.6 in unreleased until after
the unfreeze?
What, in particular, should I look out for in the testsuite?
(I imagine that many things would be broken, independent of
this change.) Maybe I should just mail the entire build log
to the list? (Unless someone can figure out how I can upload
it to debian-ports.org… and I whether my MTA can deal with
that – probably on a good-connected machine.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
22:20⎜<asarch> The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master
22:21⎜<asarch> And the distance between the craziness and geniality is
only measured by the success 18:35⎜<asarch> "Psychotics are consistently
inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent
Reply to: