[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: About gcc builtin atomics



Mikael Pettersson dixit:

>IMO it's better to do this "properly" by modifying the gcc sources,

Profit! stage1 built:

root@ara3:....6.3/build/prev-m68k-linux-gnu/libgcc # for a in *.{a,so};do echo $a $(nm $a|fgrep -c __sync_);don>
libgcc.a 45
libgcc_eh.a 0
libgcov.a 0
libgcc_s.so 0

So, I guess on Thundersday we’ll have an even cooler gcc-4.6 in dpo ☺
which _might_ even let us build Mesa unpatched… we’ll see…

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<gcc> ncal.c: In function 'parsemonth': warning: comparison between pointer
and integer  • <mirabilos> ↑ hab da „in function parselmouth“ gelesen
<Natureshadow> ICH AUCH! • <Natureshadow> Ich hab gerade gedacht "Häh? Wie,
hab da parselmouth gelesen ... steht da doch auch :o?"	-- too much fanfic…


Reply to: