[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3



I’ve tested the below patch locally in the meantime, and it
does not break anything.

Aurelien Jarno dixit:

>On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Andreas Schwab dixit:
>> 
>> >Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> writes:
>> >
>> >> Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- eglibc-2.13.orig/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S	2011-12-04 14:36:16.000000000 +0000
>> >> +++ eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S	2011-12-04 14:36:26.000000000 +0000
>> >> @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
>> >>  	.text
>> >>  ENTRY (syscall)
>> >>  	move.l 4(%sp), %d0	/* Load syscall number.  */
>> >> -	_DOARGS_5 (24)		/* Frob arguments.  */
>> >> +	_DOARGS_6 (28)		/* Frob arguments.  */
>> >>  	trap &0			/* Do the system call.  */
>> >> -	UNDOARGS_5		/* Unfrob arguments.  */
>> >> +	UNDOARGS_6		/* Unfrob arguments.  */
>> >>  	cmp.l &-4095, %d0	/* Check %d0 for error.  */
>> >>  	jcc SYSCALL_ERROR_LABEL	/* Jump to error handler if negative.  */
>> >>  	rts			/* Return to caller.  */
>> >
>> >Thanks, installed.
>> 
>> (Where?) So, should $someone submit that to eglibc-ports and
>> Debisn src:eglibc? Did it indeed do the trick?
>
>This patch should be reported to libc-ports@sourceware.org. If it also 

Reporting hereby.

>needs to be applied to the Debian package quickly, please open a bug 
>report in the Debian BTS.

@kernel people, is this needed / useful? Do we want/need this?
(I wonder why it's not using _DOARGS_6 already, as that looks
as if it were designed for it.)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
22:20⎜<asarch> The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master
22:21⎜<asarch> And the distance between the craziness and geniality is
only measured by the success 18:35⎜<asarch> "Psychotics are consistently
inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent


Reply to: