Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > 2.6.25rc9 vanilla still has the byte ordering problem on IDE, is that what
> > your ide bug patch is about?
>
> 2.6.25 indeed still needs 141-ide.diff.
Rats, I probably need that.
> > Speaking of IDE bug: the IDE lock_release bug is indeed gone for good even
> > when testing on real hardware.
>
> Good! I'll add it.
Good stuff!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- kernel
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: kernel
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: kernel
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: kernel
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: kernel
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: kernel
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: kernel
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: kernel
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>