On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running. > > If you need some debian-installer help, please let me know. > > Even with the fpu bugs, do ya'll think aranym is ready to be a regular > > buildd? In the coming months, I may be in a position to host an instance > > or two. > > How about distcc and crosscc setups? Especially those long lasting builds > like compiler suites might be a little bit faster, although the most time is > most likely spent on the test suites. I believe that gcc for instance starts to compile itself pretty quickly, so I don't think distcc and crosscc will help. I do think distcc/crosscc has helped zeus and poseidon continue to be productive. > Some packages are built quite regularly like bouml, which takes some days to > build. We maybe should postpone such sort of packages in order to build > packages that weren't built for a long time? We can manually set buildd priorities. We'd just need to figure out what they should be. I've watched zsh-dev buildd three times while we still have packages which haven't built since gcc-defaults got updated (Dec. 28). -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature