Re: Can we have jigdo (cd templates)
- To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Cc: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Can we have jigdo (cd templates)
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:06:56 +0200
- Message-id: <20070502090656.GA23530@grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704211610040.21445@loopy.telegraphics.com.au>
- References: <b19c9ba70704191751p3b606a0dr7f5e08d4ce58b3bf@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704201123080.5753@loopy.telegraphics.com.au> <20070420164316.GA13623@marenka.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704211610040.21445@loopy.telegraphics.com.au>
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 04:13:00PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:27:44AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> > >
> > > > ps. thanks for NOT posting here where we can get this etch-m68k.
> > >
> > > Are you being sarcastic? There is no etch-m68k yet AFAIK.
> >
> > There really is an etch-m68k. It's a distribution, sitting next to etch,
> > lenny, and sid on your favorite mirrors <e.g.,
> > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/>. It's not stable (it's etch-m68k)
> > and it's not (yet?) security supported, but it seems to run nicely.
>
> I knew about that from reading this list, but I didn't know that we had
> caught up with the whole archive that was released as "etch" (inasmuch as
> it applies to us)...
We haven't. I don't think we've even started building yet, though we
should make work of that pretty soon. But the quality of etch as a whole
is such that etch-m68k is usable already.
--
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.
Reply to: