On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet > aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and those should > probably build without issues. It will require a patched sbuild, > probably, but that's not a big issue. Couldn't we just do that under the existing w-b setup or will there be no support for that? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature