Re: Why are these Not-For-Us?
Hi,
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> adacontrol No ada on m68k?
Nope.
> cacao
Looks like it needs serious porting work.
> cynthiune.app Was Dep-Wait, for what?
> edos-debcheck
Should work.
> liblinux-inotify2-perl
Easily portable.
> libpam-encfs
> vnstat Source archlist says any
> wmnetload
Should work.
> PS: I send a long list of packages to P-a-s for inclusion. Everything
> with m68k not in the arch list or otherwise obvious. That covers most
> of the rest in N-f-U.
Some of them we might want to recheck, it seems some have been fixed not
to require ocamlopt anymore.
bye, Roman
Reply to: